Hankins: Calvinism Dangerous to SBC

Joshua —  April 11, 2012 — 18 Comments

In a recent comment on his own post at SBCToday.com, Dr. Eric Hankins, pastor of First Baptist Church of Oxford, Mississippi and son of David Hankins, the Executive Director of the Louisiana Baptist Convention, joined the vocal group of Southern Baptists who view Calvinism within the Southern Baptist Convention as a danger that needs to be dealt with.

Hankins states:

…this growing problem didn’t start with guys like me condemning Calvinism. For instance, the SBC gladly placed Al Mohler at Southern knowing full-well he was a Calvinist. We were proud and appreciative of his erudition and leadership. But the neo-Calvinists started the name calling and pushing, saying things like, “most Southern Baptists are semi-pelagian.” If they don’t want a fight, they shouldn’t use fighting words. So, now that the issue is being pushed, it looks like we’re going to argue it all the way out. I, for one, believe the logical conclusions of Calvinism are clear and they are dangerous, and I will be encouraging other Southern Baptists not to subscribe to it. I think that will be pretty easy because most of them don’t.

http://sbctoday.com/2012/04/05/beyond-calvinism-and-arminianismtoward-a-baptist-soteriology/#comment-19934

Hankins is not alone. In the past year, several prominent Southern Baptists who view Calvinism as a threat to Southern Baptist life have been vocal and unashamed in their rhetoric.

Here are a few quotes:

I have stated before, so it’s not new news, that should the SBC move toward five-point Calvinism it will be a move away from, not toward, the gospel. – Jerry Vines, January, 2012

http://sbctoday.com/2012/01/24/an-interview-with-jerry-vines/

 

The current trend in Southern Baptist life to imitate the Reformed movement is a major step backwards and must be resisted. – Paige Patterson, February, 2012

http://thedailybleat.com/an-anabaptist-infatuation-amongst-some-southern-baptists/

 

While most of the Reformed pastors and churchmen I know are gracious and godly people with a profound devotion to the Word of God, Southern Baptists must decide if they are satisfied with what I would call the presumable encroachment of Calvinism in SBC life. – Gerald Harris, February, 2012

http://blog.founders.org/2012/02/georgia-indexs-gerald-harris-on.html

For a number of years there has been a plan to raise up an “army” of Calvinists in an effort to capture the SBC for the Reformed position. People will deny this and use all kinds of “doubles-speak” to talk around it but anyone who has been involved even in a casual manner knows this is true. And, at the present time, we are experiencing problems which stem directly from this effort. – Bill Harrell, March, 2012

http://sbctoday.com/2012/03/06/an-interview-with-bill-harrell/

Hankins further states that he believes a conspiracy is underway within the convention and being led by Calvinists:

Fourth, “how much weight should be behind what ‘most most Baptists believe and think others ought to believe?’” Uh, all of it. Unless we are moving to a presbyterian polity, the SBC will reflect the will of member churches, which are autonomous. The only way to change the soteriology of the SBC would be to take over some seminaries, produce Calvinist pastors, take over the literature used in the Sunday Schools and slowly move all the churches to a Calvinist soteriology. Hey, wait a second . . . [Full quote]

These are troubling words for those who desire cooperation within the SBC. To call a viable and historic Southern Baptist theological system dangerous and to assert there is a deceptive conspiracy to take over the convention is unfortunate. I believe most Southern Baptists would denounce such rhetoric, especially in light of an understanding of the rich history Calvinism has within the SBC.

However, there is good news. Fred Luter, the presumed next president of the SBC, was recently asked, “Do you think resurgence of Reformed theology is a threat to the SBC identity?” Luter responded, “Not at all.”

It will be the Fred Luters of the convention who unite both Calvinists and Non-Calvinists to be about the business of the SBC. The business of bringing the gospel to all people through the cooperation of those gathered under the doctrinally broad Baptist Faith and Message 2000.

Dr. Charles Quarles, Vice President for Integration of Faith and Learning and Dean of the Caskey School of Divinity at Louisiana College, recently wrote in the Baptist Message on the issue of Calvinism in the SBC and choosing our battles wisely. I enthusiastically agree with his words and believe they will serve us all well for the days ahead. Quarles writes, “In the face of enormous threats from universalism, naturalism, atheism, and mysticism, will we battle each other over Calvinism? I hope not.”

Joshua

Posts Twitter Facebook

I am a disciple of the risen Christ Jesus, husband to Libby, grad student, blogger.
  • James

    I would like for them to expound on the dangers of Arminianism in the SBC. I will not hold my breath.

    • thedailybleat

      James,

      I wouldn’t hold mine either.

  • Nottmb

    Those dangerous Calvinists like B.H. Carroll and James Pettigru Boice, right….

    • thedailybleat

      Nottmb,

      Lottie Moon, William Carey, John Broadus, Basil Manly Jr., yes…THOSE people and their dangerous theology.

  • Lartoguy

    So many things I can speak about here! But I will not. I will simply trust in God’s sovereignty in ALL things.

  • gingersnap

    I can’t believe that this is real….

  • 1WayneDawg1

    There must be a meeting every month or so among SBC pastors to make sure they are all on the same page in their hostility towards Calvinism.

    My pastor, just a few weeks ago, called Calvinism a heresy and even held a Wednesday night Bible study to pick apart the TULIP petals.

    • thedailybleat

      Wayne,

      There are emails circulating daily about the big bad bogeyman. It will die down soon enough.

  • Bentonfoster

    It is a shame that Southern Baptists are in such a hurry to distance themselves from their own real history…Get rid of Southern, Baptist, now Calvinism. I guess Jesus is next. I am sad for my Baptist brothers. Get back to your roots. Quit chasing fads and numbers.

    • http://www.thedailybleat.com/ Joshua Breland

      Benton,

      It is not all that surprising though. For generations, Southern Baptist seminaries gave no focus to Protestant theology and Christian history. Seminary was where one took classes on sermon prep, broad Bible classes, and practical ministry tools.

      This will be changing in the coming years though as the Conservative Resurgence has led to a drastically different Seminary curriculum that returns Baptists not only to God’s Word as the center of all ministry but also returns Southern Baptists to their Baptist and Protestant roots.

      Thanks for stopping by!

      • kim

        Joshua, does Louisiana College have a reformed position?

        • http://www.thedailybleat.com/ Joshua Breland

          Kim,

          What do you mean?

          Louisiana College is like most other SBC colleges, comprised of both Calvinist and non-Calvinist faculty and students. There is not a monolithic position of “reformed” here by any means.

  • http://uioitheou.wordpress.com/ Resequitur

    Calvinism creeping in the Southern Baptist Church???!! Someone needs to tell the SBC founder! oh wait……

  • http://www.rondall-reynoso.com/ Rondall Reynoso

    I find it troubling that the SBC fights so vigorously over secondary doctrines. To me these are all disputable and make for great fodder for discussion, but should not be getting the type of attention or rancor they are. The one point that does bother me is that in my time in Louisiana there does seem to be some secretiveness on the part of the Calvinists. It may well be out of fear because of the hard stances taken by others. But, I think there are plenty of people like me who while not Calvinistic in our theology would fully support its orthodoxy and defend those who teach from that perspective. That does become more difficult there is an air of secrecy.

    I will also say that Armenians are not the only ones who take hard lines about the relationship of Calvinism to the gospel. I know of some Calvinists who think there is no Gospel without Calvinism. I also have heard others teach who are a little more cautious but if you follow through the logic of their arguments it actually leaves Armenianism outside of the Gospel. Grace is needed from both sides. I would prefer that it not even be seen ass sides but as people who are seeking after Truth coming to different conclusions.

    I don’t know that discussions about the dangers of Calvinism in the SBC are helpful. But, at the same time retorts about the dangers of Aremianism in the SBC or charges of semi-pelagianism are helpful either. There are plenty of criticisms about the SBC. But, I would like to see those who do value scripture as the word of God (not a religious idol) work together at plumbing the depths of scripture and living it out in integrity rather than fighting over things like this. My problem with the SBC has nothing to do with Calvinism vs. Armenianism but rather that I see a lot of the theological arguments as rooted in the pursuit of power rather than the pursuit of truth. And also, I view the SBC as having some significant integrity issues.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TXBCSVH4E4EWXROYYVUJWK5GDM Larry

    This debate will not go away ever! Make no mistake brothers, it is the gospel of Jesus Christ that is at stake. Each side MUST fully engage this issue and seek to completely understand the others positions. The SBC was founded by Covenantal Calvinistic Baptists, this is beyond dispute. So how did the denomination end up being heavily dispensational and dare I say “semi-palagian”? Semi-Palagianism is not slander or a fighting word; it is an accurate description of the soteriological position of most Southern Baptists and most evangelicals for that matter. This is the dabate of the ages and now it must be debated in the SBC. It is about the very nature of God and how he saves sinners, it is by no means a secondary issue. The Glory of God is what is at stake and this Calvinist is telling you that semi-palagianism robs God of His Glory. Take up your swords and fight this battle, but do it with humility and a teachable spirit. I believe your denomination is in the midst of its own reformation. Which side are you on Trent or Geneva?

  • steve

    Beware the Calvinist boogeymen!

  • Pingback: jasonkees.net | A Ticking Bomb: Calvinism in the SBC