Historic Baptist Confessions and the Doctrine of Original Sin

Joshua —  August 30, 2011 — 7 Comments

The doctrine known as “original sin” is an historic Christian doctrine affirming that Adam’s guilt is imputed to all of his posterity. That is to say, man is born under present condemnation, not for his future transgressions but for the imputed sin of his head, Adam. This doctrine is affirmed by several historic Baptist confessions of faith (see chart below). The first edition of the Baptist Faith & Message (1925) also affirms the doctrine:

He was created in a state of holiness under the law of his Maker, but, through the temptation of Satan, he transgressed the command of God and fell from his original holiness and righteousness; whereby his posterity inherit a nature corrupt and in bondage to sin, are under condemnation, and as soon as they are capable of moral action, become actual transgressors.

The revision of the 1925 BF&M in 1963 deviates from its preceding document and subsequently denies the historic Baptist doctrine known as original sin. The 1963 BF&M states:

Through the temptation of Satan man transgressed the command of God, and fell from his original innocence; whereby his posterity inherit a nature and an environment inclined toward sin, and as soon as they are capable of moral action become transgressors and are under condemnation. 

The revision to the 1963 BF&M, the 2000 BF&M, maintains the denial of the doctrine of original sin by stating that man is only under condemnation after becoming capable of moral action and becoming actual transgressors.

I have created a chart of the historic Baptist confessions that affirm original sin and the eventual denial by the Southern Baptist Convention in the 1963 Baptist Faith & Message.

Joshua

Posts Twitter Facebook

I am a disciple of the risen Christ Jesus, husband to Libby, grad student, blogger.
  • TeslaTrav

    Came across this while preparing a Sunday school lesson on Original Sin for my HS sunday school class. Neat read! Appreciate it!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=160000130 Joshua Curtis Breland

      Glad it could help! Thanks for stopping by!

  • Patrick Schreiner

    Is this in response to a certain document that came out recently?

    • http://www.thedailybleat.com/ Joshua Breland

      Patrick,

      I made this a year ago after interacting with some folks who have now signed the new document.

  • http://www.frankgantz.com/ Frank Gantz

    Joshua, I’m loving this blog. What you are doing really helps set current controversy in a historical context.

    • http://www.thedailybleat.com/ Joshua Breland

      Thanks Frank!

  • Capnvash88

    Joshua, thank you so much brother for this work. I am sure that this is incredibly valuable given the mutable nature of the contemporary SBC-er—especially in light of the current judgmental boldness in the public square. In some way, this post was unknowingly a prophetic need. I look forward to traveling to NOLA with you.