Archives For sbctoday

There is much discussion regarding the use of the phrase “ask Jesus into your heart” during sermons or evangelism events. David Platt recently spoke about the phrase being “superstitious and unbiblical” because it does not communicate the gospel imperative that one must repent and put their trust or faith in Christ alone.

Recently, in an article at SBCToday.com, Pastor Ron Hale fails to understand Platt’s message, asserting that Platt does not believe in prayer accompanying salvation. Hale later erects a strawman in the comments section, “I’ve determined that I’m not going to walk around …fearful that somebody might get saved.” Continue Reading…

Once again, SBCToday.com has made itself the proliferator of paranoia, conspiracy, and outright fear mongering on the issue of Calvinism in the SBC.

Yesterday, I quoted former SBC Executive Committee chairman Bill Harrell’s recent comments on Calvinism in a post documenting Eric Hankins’ unfortunate comments on Calvinism. Today, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Provost Steve Lemke posted an article by Harrell titled “Things That Bear Watching.”

I am not going to interact with Harrell’s words as he has made it clear he has no desire to listen to anyone younger or less experienced than himself. His self-importance is made aware in the last paragraph:

I know that what I have said will be decried as harsh, but we are dealing with harsh realities in the SBC. If things follow a normal course, it will be the young theologues who have little or no experience who will be the harshest in their criticism of my thoughts. They are still “wet behind the ears” and don’t have the experience or background to say very much at all. In general they have no respect for those who have had a ministry of forty or more years. I really don’t care who says what. My observations are built on the foundation of sixteen years on the Executive Committee and thirty eight years of pastoring Southern Baptist churches.

So, instead of interacting with Harrell’s words I will merely post quotes from his writing that display the unfortunate fear mongering and division that need not take place in a convention that has a rich history of Calvinism and welcomes Calvinists as good Southern Baptists. Continue Reading…

In a recent comment on his own post at SBCToday.com, Dr. Eric Hankins, pastor of First Baptist Church of Oxford, Mississippi and son of David Hankins, the Executive Director of the Louisiana Baptist Convention, joined the vocal group of Southern Baptists who view Calvinism within the Southern Baptist Convention as a danger that needs to be dealt with.

Hankins states:

…this growing problem didn’t start with guys like me condemning Calvinism. For instance, the SBC gladly placed Al Mohler at Southern knowing full-well he was a Calvinist. We were proud and appreciative of his erudition and leadership. But the neo-Calvinists started the name calling and pushing, saying things like, “most Southern Baptists are semi-pelagian.” If they don’t want a fight, they shouldn’t use fighting words. So, now that the issue is being pushed, it looks like we’re going to argue it all the way out. I, for one, believe the logical conclusions of Calvinism are clear and they are dangerous, and I will be encouraging other Southern Baptists not to subscribe to it. I think that will be pretty easy because most of them don’t.

http://sbctoday.com/2012/04/05/beyond-calvinism-and-arminianismtoward-a-baptist-soteriology/#comment-19934

Hankins is not alone. In the past year, several prominent Southern Baptists who view Calvinism as a threat to Southern Baptist life have been vocal and unashamed in their rhetoric. Continue Reading…

Click on image for larger view.

In a recent interview on SBCToday.com, a Southern Baptist pastor and contributor to SBCToday.com made an assertion regarding the Baptist Faith & Message 2000 not supporting the doctrine of “double predestination.” Double predestination is more commonly understood as election and reprobation. Southern Baptist founder and leader James Boyce explains more here.

The SBC pastor, Ron Hale, asserts:

The vast majority of Southern Baptists do not believe in “double predestination” and the BFM does not support this doctrine.

Pastor Hale asserts that the BF&M denies the doctrine of reprobation, or at the very least does not support the doctrine. I asked the pastor to cite where in the BF&M reprobation or double predestination is denied and he refused. Three times I asked, only to receive dodge after dodge, and then a final casual dismissal by means of another pastor, David Worley, citing Proverbs 17:12.

We must do better, especially pastors, than to make claims about our denominational confession and then refuse to support our assertion(s). This is misleading and dishonest.

The fact is, there are many good Southern Baptists who believe in the doctrines of election and reprobation, and they do so while also affirming the BF&M 2000. The BF&M 2000 does not support nor deny the doctrine of reprobation. The document’s silence on the matter is not cause for concern since the document is not meant to be an exhaustive doctrinal confession. Pastor Ron Hale’s assertion is not only false, it is also unfair and, as you can see in the image to the right, utterly unsupported.